RAJIA BEGUM versus BARNALI MUKHERJEE

[2026] 2 S.C.R. 270 2026 INSC 106

Case summary from SCR

Issue for Consideration Whether the disputes can be referred to arbitration or an arbitrator can be appointed when the very existence of arbitration agreement itself is seriously disputed on the allegations of forgery and fabrication; whether in the factual matrix of the case, the disputes to the arbitration u/s.8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and correspondingly whether the High Court was justified in declining the appointment of an arbitrator u/s.11 of the 1996 Act. Headnotes† Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Impact of fraud on

Full judgment text is being verified.

This page currently contains source metadata only. The complete SCR text will appear here only after its wording, order, sections, and footnotes pass fidelity checks.