2025 Supreme Court judgments

Browse the collected 2025 SCR catalog by case, judge, citation, and decision details.

This collection does not claim complete annual coverage. Source metadata: Supreme Court Reports (SCR). The authoritative source record prevails.

3 judgments

Page 1 of 1

2025 INSC 125 [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1209

DR. TANVI BEHL versus SHREY GOEL & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 9289/2019
Bench
3 judges

Issue for Consideration Whether providing domicile/residence-based reservation in admission to Postgraduate (PG) Medical Courses within the State Quota is constitutionally invalid and impermissible; Difference between domicile and residence discussed. Headnotes† Constitution of India, Reservation in PG Medical Course – Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh reserved 64 PG medical seats in State Quota – 32 seats reserved for “residents” of State and 32 seats reserved for those who have done their MBBS from the same Medical College in

View judgment record
2025 INSC 124 [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1782

INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. versus GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 6071/2023
Bench
3 judges

Issue for Consideration Whether the approval of a proposed combination by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must mandatorily precede the approval of the Resolution Plan, by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), as stipulated under the proviso to Section 31(4) of Code, 2016. Headnotes† Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – s.31(4) proviso – If mandatory or directory – Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of ‘HNGIL’, the Corporate Debtor/Target Company with a 60% market share of the glass packaging industry

View judgment record
2025 INSC 126 [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1173

KRISHNADATT AWASTHY versus STATE OF M.P. & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4806/2011
Bench
3 judges

Issue for Consideration Whether the selection is vitiated for violation of the first limb of natural justice i.e. rule against bias; whether it is a case of violation of the principle of audi alteram partem and is demonstration of prejudice necessary to succeed with a claim of violation of alteram partem; whether the breach of the principle of audi alteram partem at the original stage can be cured, at the revisional stage. Headnotes† Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 – Principle of natural justice – Rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua)

View judgment record