Judgments, made findable.

Browse the verified 2026 SCR catalog by case, judge, citation, and decision details.

Source metadata: Supreme Court Reports (SCR). The authoritative source record prevails.

5 judgments

Page 1 of 1

2026 INSC 466 [2026] 5 S.C.R. 522

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. versus RANJAN KUMAR & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 7364/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary action taken against respondent No.1, culminating in his removal from service, suffers from any legal infirmity warranting interference. Headnotes† Service law – Dismissal from service – Respondent under the name “SK” with Bihar Police while continuing in service as a Constable in the Jharkhand Police under the name “RK” through fabricated documents and thereafter remained unauthorisedly absent from service – Memorandum of charge issued in view of the

View judgment record
2026 INSC 495 [2026] 6 S.C.R. 311

B. YERRAJI & ORS. versus THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 7371/2026
Bench
2 Judges

311 : 2026 INSC 495 B. Yerraji & Ors. A1: B. Yerraji A2: J. Appa Rao A3: N. Srinivasa Rao A4: Ch. Sriramulu A5: S. Kanakaraju A6: M. Yellaji Rao A7: N. Thatarao A8: S. Appayamma A9: D. Venkata Rathnam A10: G. Appalaraju A11: G. Appala Raju A12: B. Kanaka Raju A13: N. Appa Rao A14: M. Gandhi Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the appellant-Grade-IV employees who had not been granted the / benefit of minimum of the regular scale after being in service for a long number of years despite having an Order in their favour; whether in the absence

View judgment record
2026 INSC 348 [2026] 4 S.C.R. 508

SRI M.V. RAMACHANDRASA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRS versus M/S MAHENDRA WATCH COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4353/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the findings of fact recorded by the trial Court while exercising its revisional jurisdiction u/s.46 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999; of proving unlawful sub-letting lies upon the landlord, and if so, whether such burden was duly discharged in the present case; whether the alleged retirement of the original tenant-partner and continuation of business by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 constituted a mere reconstitution of partnership or

View judgment record
2026 INSC 225 [2026] 3 S.C.R. 448

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. versus RAJKUMAR YADAV

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 3279/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Challenge to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court setting aside the order of the Single Judge by way of which the Single Judge had dismissed the writ petition of respondent wherein he had challenged the rejection of his candidature by the screening post of constable (driver) in the police force on the ground that he had criminal antecedents. Headnotes† Service Law – Recruitment in Police Force – M.P. Police Regulations – Rejection of candidature by screening committee for appointment to the post of constable (driver)

View judgment record
2026 INSC 31 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 191

THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA BAGALKOTE DISTRICT, BAGALKOT versus CHANDRASHEKAR & ANR.

Decision
Case
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 77/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Whether present is a case where the criminal proceedings can be quashed on the exoneration of the respondent-delinquent employee in the departmental enquiry or they be permitted to continue. Headnotes† Disciplinary enquiry vis-à-vis Criminal proceedings when cannot be quashed on the exoneration of the delinquent employee in the departmental enquiry – Respondent, an Executive Engineer (Electrical) was alleged to have demanded a bribe from an electrical contractor – Contractor complained to the Anti-Corruption

View judgment record