Judgments, made findable.

Browse the verified 2026 SCR catalog by case, judge, citation, and decision details.

Source metadata: Supreme Court Reports (SCR). The authoritative source record prevails.

7 judgments

Page 1 of 1

2026 INSC 132 [2026] 2 S.C.R. 497

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. versus JAI HIND PVT. LTD.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 7407/2012
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the Revenue Officer could have reviewed the earlier order of the Revenue Officer; whether the respondent- company had fulfilled the conditions to be entitled to retain the lands u/s.6(1)(j) of the WBEA Act, 1953; and whether it was farming” as on 1st January 1952 to claim exemption from vesting under the 1971 determination. Headnotes† West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 – ss.6(1), 6(1)(j) – West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 – ss.57, 14T(3) – Power of review by Revenue

View judgment record
2026 INSC 130 [2026] 2 S.C.R. 406

M/S. NAV NIRMAN BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAVEEN SINGH versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT OF INDIA RANCHI, JHARKHAND

Decision
Case
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 729/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration In the instant case, this Court is concerned with the decision-making process adopted by the Special Court. Instead filed u/s.8(7) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), and awaiting the adjudication by the Appellate Tribunal u/s.26 of the PMLA, the Special Court has allowed the said application. Headnotes† Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 – ss.8(7) and s.8(8):

View judgment record
2026 INSC 69 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1128

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. versus SHAM KRISHNA B & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 304/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the justification of the shifting of reserve category candidates who has not availed any concession or relaxation towards the list of unreserved category candidates; and the correctness of the order passed by the High Court directing that the to the vacancy that had been kept vacant by the Single Judge’s order. Headnotes† Service law – Appointment/selection – Shifting of reserve category candidates who has not availed any concession or relaxation towards the list of unreserved category candidates –

View judgment record
2026 INSC 68 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1106

MD. FIROZ MANSURI & ORS. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Decision
Case
CIVIL APPEAL No. 295/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the High Court erred in upholding the constitutional validity of the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014 (as amended by Bihar Pharmacist Cadre (Amendment) Rules, 2024; and whether candidates holding Bachelor or Master of Pharmacy degrees, without in Pharmacy, satisfy the minimum eligibility criteria prescribed for appointment to the post of Pharmacist (basic category) under the said Rules. Headnotes† Pharmacy Act, 1948 – Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015 – Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014 (as amended by the Bihar

View judgment record
2026 INSC 115 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1882

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR.

Decision
Case
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 2034/2022
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether notices u/s.35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are to be mandatorily issued in all cases, qua an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years; absence of circumstances u/ss.35(1)(b)(i) and 35(1)(b)(ii) BNSS, 2023 existing, is an arrest by a police officer, qua an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years, legally justified. Headnotes† Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – ss.35(3), 35(1)(b)(i) and 35(1)(b)(ii)

View judgment record
2026 INSC 79 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1202

PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES & ANR. versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Decision
Case
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1255/1999
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to issuance of direction to the States to evolve an appropriate policy for media briefing. Headnotes† Police Manual – Police Manual for Media Briefing – Police Manual for Media Briefing prepared by the Amicus, the Union of India and the prevailing international practices – Issuance of direction to the States to evolve an appropriate policy for Media Briefing, taking into consideration the Police Manual for Media Briefing furnished by the Amicus Curiae – Needful to be done within the

View judgment record
2026 INSC 37 [2026] 1 S.C.R. 740

THE JOINT DIRECTOR (RAYALASEEMA), ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, A.P. & ANR. ETC. versus DAYAM PEDA RANGA RAO ETC.

Decision
Case
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 122/2026
Bench
2 Judges

Issue for Consideration A set of cases where, the FIRs registered, for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 have been quashed, which left the investigation(s) being nipped in the bud in some cases, while, in proceedings stood terminated. The High Court has undertaken the said exercise, solely on the issue of jurisdiction of the police station which registered the FIRs. Headnotes† Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.2(s) – Bharatiya

View judgment record