Issue for Consideration The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is two-fold. Firstly, the in-part acceptance of his application u/s.311 of the CrPC and consequent non-summoning of witness-K. Secondly, closure of the summoned witness-V. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.311 – The petitioner filed an application u/s.311 of the CrPC/Code for summoning two persons, viz., V and K – The Trial Court partly allowed the application and issued summons to the witness-V and
Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order passed by family court not awarding any maintenance to the appellant-wife. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Maintenance – Appellant-wife married to respondent no.2-husband according to Islamic customs and had two children – Husband filed divorce suit against the appellant in the ‘Court of Kazi’ which came to be dismissed in terms of the compromise between the parties –
Issue for Consideration Whether providing domicile/residence-based reservation in admission to Postgraduate (PG) Medical Courses within the State Quota is constitutionally invalid and impermissible; Difference between domicile and residence discussed. Headnotes† Constitution of India, Reservation in PG Medical Course – Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh reserved 64 PG medical seats in State Quota – 32 seats reserved for “residents” of State and 32 seats reserved for those who have done their MBBS from the same Medical College in
Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court reducing the amount of compensation granted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Headnotes† Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Compensation of the appellants met with an accident resulting in their death while travelling in a vehicle after the bus belonging to respondent no.3 dashed into the said vehicle – Appellants claimed identical compensation for the parents as both were partners in a Mill – Tribunal granted
Issue for Consideration Whether the approval of a proposed combination by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must mandatorily precede the approval of the Resolution Plan, by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), as stipulated under the proviso to Section 31(4) of Code, 2016. Headnotes† Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – s.31(4) proviso – If mandatory or directory – Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of ‘HNGIL’, the Corporate Debtor/Target Company with a 60% market share of the glass packaging industry
Issue for Consideration Whether the selection is vitiated for violation of the first limb of natural justice i.e. rule against bias; whether it is a case of violation of the principle of audi alteram partem and is demonstration of prejudice necessary to succeed with a claim of violation of alteram partem; whether the breach of the principle of audi alteram partem at the original stage can be cured, at the revisional stage. Headnotes† Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 – Principle of natural justice – Rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua)
Issue for Consideration Preliminary notification u/s.17(1) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 was issued on 20.03.1999 proposing to acquire 4 acres and 15 guntas of land from The entire transaction with regard to acquisition and voluntary surrender of land under the Bangalore Development Authority (Incentive Scheme for Voluntary Surrender of Land) Rules, 1989 [the original Incentive Rules of 1989] as well as possession and also notification under